https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:45014 Thu 27 Oct 2022 17:55:44 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:24021 F test, control of the familywise error rate, control of the false discovery rate, and preregistration of the hypotheses.]]> Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:16:44 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:24685 10). In several studies, effect size estimates were substantially lower than in the original studies. To our knowledge, this is the first multi-study confirmatory replication of SBB correlations. With this study, we hope to encourage other researchers to undertake similar replication attempts.]]> Sat 24 Mar 2018 07:10:54 AEDT ]]> https://ogma.newcastle.edu.au/vital/access/ /manager/Repository/uon:32451 forking paths problem and evaluates four potential solutions that might be used in psychology and other fields: (a) adjusting the prespecified alpha level, (b) preregistration, (c) sensitivity analyses, and (d) abandoning the Neyman-Pearson approach. It is concluded that although preregistration and sensitivity analyses are effective solutions to p-hacking, they are ineffective against result-neutral forking paths, such as those caused by transforming data. Conversely, although adjusting the alpha level cannot address p-hacking, it can be effective for result-neutral forking paths. Finally, abandoning the Neyman-Pearson approach represents a further solution to the forking paths problem.]]> Mon 23 Sep 2019 10:06:42 AEST ]]>